![]() We really don't have Zen 4 IPC numbers yet. Reeven computix plus#Anyone who expected Zen 4 to be as big of an improvement as Zen 3 was, PLUS also be a node shrink, wasn't paying attention to AMD's statements on the matter that Zen 3 and Zen 5 are the bigger changes. Die shrinks with only smaller architectural changes and tweaks, then major architectural changes on the same node. This is sort of a tick-tock like pattern that Intel used to do. Expect Zen 5 to be the same sort of thing: A new design on the same node where most of the IPC improvements end up. The big architectural IPC improvements came with Zen3, on the same N7 node as Zen 2. Zen 2 did double the 元 cache though, and had some branch predictor improvements, and the AVX2 native support - the FP/AVX improvements for Zen2 made it quite a bit better at CineBench. This is somewhat like Zen 2: Shrink to a new node, but not an architectural overhaul. Its been in the works for at least 4 years if not more, not 2. They didn't just start working on it when Zen 3 was released. One thing I’m wondering is what kind of gains will we see with DDR5? I know Intels 12xxx chips see pretty good gains going from 4 to 5, and with AMD’s architecture benefiting more from faster memory, I wonder if AMD is going to match or surpass the gains Intel has going from 4 to 5. I was hoping for RDNA3, buuut I guess since Nvidia hasn’t shown their hand yet it would be wise to wait until after. We don’t even know if they have a 3D version laying in wait for Intel to drop their new lineup.Įither way, I do agree this was a lack-luster keynote. I’m wondering if AMD opted to low-ball these numbers to fuck with Intel, or if they did so to play it safe. ![]() ![]() ![]() I think that wordings better than “up to.” One thing I tend to see is people will completely ignore the “up to,” and then wonder why they aren’t seeing the numbers AMD said. I’d venture a guess that 15% is the baseline improvement with different applications benefitting differently and 15% just happened to be the lowest amount of gains. Everyone’s quoting 15% increase as if that’s it, that little greater than sign does mean something. They have quite some time to tweak things, and as someone did say in this thread, showing performance data would either kill their current sales with people waiting for release, or potentially boost Intels sales, all depending on the performance.Īlso, the presentation showed >15% better single core performance. They're even selling a new Nitro 5 gaming notebook that incorporates both a Ryzen CPU and AMD's new 7-nanometer Radeon RX 5000 graphics card.She did say they were using a “pre-production” CPU, and they’re coming “this fall.”Ī bunch of chicken littles screaming the sky is falling in this thread. Given the quality of their recent Matebook hardware, this is a shame – but given recent events involving the company, it’s not a massive surprise.ĭuring the AMD press conference, a representative from Acer claimed that the OEM will soon begin selling Ryzen-powered notebook PCs for customers across the education, thin & light and Chromebook markets. Interestingly, Huawei appears to have been quietly dropped from the Ryzen Mobile partner line-up. As did a list that included names like Samsung, Lenovo, Dell, HP, Acer and ASUS. ![]() Who will be making those devices? Well, during the presentation, representatives from several of AMD’s OEM partners appeared. Reeven computix portable#Where previous Ryzen Mobile laptops have primary concerned themselves with specific niches like portable power-users, Su now say that there will be Ryzen Mobile options for "all price points" and from "all the top OEMs." Specifically, Su made the claim that around 50% of “modern devices” this year will feature the new Ryzen mobile chipsets. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |