![]() ![]() So, Jesus didn't have to bleed to death to be the antitype or fulfillment – he merely had to be slain and blood be spilt (cf. 10:3-4), whereas the sacrifice of Jesus literally took away the sins of his people (Matt. Indeed, those sacrifices were but an annual reminder of sins because "it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins" (Heb. 1:18-21) that takes away the sins of his people in the world (John 1:36 Rev. 53:7-9) "without blemish or defect" (1 Pet. For instance, Jesus isn't literally a lamb, but he is "like a lamb" (Isa. There is not always a literal one-to-one correspondence between types and antitypes. It's important to understand that animal sacrifices were but a type of Christ, while Jesus is the antitype or fulfillment. So, these animals sacrifices were a foreshadowing of the "once for all" sacrifice which Jesus himself would later offer upon his own cross (Heb. In the Old Covenant, a priest once a year was to make an offering of the blood of animals on the altar for the sins of the people. Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminaryįor the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life.He Gave Us Scripture: Foundations of Interpretation.Your Kingdom Come: The Doctrine of Eschatology.Kingdom, Covenants & Canon of the Old Testament. ![]() Kingdom & Covenant in the New Testament. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |